Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine   Official publication of Indian Association of  0ccupational  Health  
 Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Users Online:171

  IAOH | Subscription | e-Alerts | Feedback | Login 

Home About us Current Issue Archives Search Instructions
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
     Search Pubmed for
     Search in Google Scholar for
   Related articles
    Article in PDF (210 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


   Abstract
   Introduction
   Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
   Acknowledgments
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3670    
    Printed187    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded322    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 43-52
 

Longitudinal follow-up of oxidative stress and DNA damage parameters in detergent workers


Department of Biology, University of Tarbiat Moalem, No. 49, Dr. Mofateh Avenue, Tehran, P.O. Box 15614, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Masoud Mashhadi Akbar Boojar
Department of Biology, University of Tarbiat Moalem, No. 49, Dr. Mofateh Avenue, Tehran, P.O. Box 15614
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5278.50724

Rights and Permissions

 

  Abstract 

Background: The aim of this study was the follow-up of work place enzyme and detergent dust exposure effects and smoking habit on DNA damage parameters of workers and the evaluation of their antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation with regard to bag-filter installation in the work place. Material and Methods: All investigated parameters were studied in a group of 153 workers of enzyme-free detergent production plant (E-free) and a group of 138 workers of enzyme-plus detergent plant (E-plus) and compared with 45 controls 7.2 years before and 3.1 years after filter system installation. The following methods were used: antioxidant enzymes by an ultraviolet-visibles spectrophotometer, malondialdehyde (MDA), 8-hydroxy-2'deoxyguanosine (8OH-2'dG) by high-performance liquid chromatography, trace elements by atomic absorption spectroscopy, and comet assay by single cell gel electrophoresis. Results: Compared with controls, significant increases were observed in both detergent-exposed groups with respect to the levels of MDA, antioxidant enzyme activities, and DNA damage parameters, including 8OH-2'dG, endonuclease III-sensitive sites, and DNA strand breaks, with enhancement effect of smoking before filter system installation. After filter installation, besides significant decrease in the detergent and enzyme dust of airborne and oxidative stress indicators, there was improvement in all DNA damage investigated parameters at the end of this study. The levels of cumulative exposure index of detergent dusts decreased significantly after airborne improvement and showed positive correlation with internal biochemical parameters. Conclusions: We concluded that high levels of enzyme and detergent contents of work place dusts had a cumulative effect and smoking had a synergistic effect on the imbalance of antioxidant status and lipid peroxidation, suggesting that oxidation stress is important in the occurrence and progression of DNA damage over this study. Detergent and enzyme contents in respirable and total dust had the main role and sufficient potential in their genotoxicity.


Keywords: Antioxidant enzymes, detergent exposure, DNA damage, environment monitoring, lipid peroxidation


How to cite this article:
Boojar MA, Goodarzi F. Longitudinal follow-up of oxidative stress and DNA damage parameters in detergent workers. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2009;13:43-52

How to cite this URL:
Boojar MA, Goodarzi F. Longitudinal follow-up of oxidative stress and DNA damage parameters in detergent workers. Indian J Occup Environ Med [serial online] 2009 [cited 2019 Apr 20];13:43-52. Available from: http://www.ijoem.com/text.asp?2009/13/1/43/50724



  Introduction Top


Free radicals are generally very reactive molecules, produced continuously during the course of normal oxidative metabolism and generated by many exogenous agents. The most important reactions of free radicals in aerobic cells involved molecular oxygen, its radical derivatives (superoxide anion and hydroxyl radicals), and peroxides. [1] Reactive oxygen species (ROS) cause damage to cells by reacting with molecules such as lipids, proteins, and DNA. [2] Oxidative DNA damage can produce base and sugar lesions, strand breaks, and base-free sites, [3] which, if left unrepaired, plays an important role in a number of disease processes. [4] Urinary 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8OH-2'dG), one of the oxidative-modified DNA bases, is a typical biomarker of oxidative stress and plays some role in carcinogenesis. [5] In addition, recent advances in the single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) allow the measurement of in situ DNA damage in lymphocytes or mononuclear cells. [6]

For many years, occupational exposure to exogenous genotoxic chemical agents has been considered as a particular domain for DNA damage study. In this domain, workers of detergent industries can be exposed to aeroallergens, including detergents and additive enzymes, during production processes that are not present in the general environment. [7] Many histological studies revealed that eosinophils, neutrophils, and phagocyte cell types infiltrate into the lung consequent to the exposure to high levels of detergent and enzyme aerosols. [8] These processes tend to enhance the stimulation of ROS production and then several indices of oxidative damage are enhanced on target biomolecules, including DNA. [9] The amount of damage depends on the rate and the extent of ROS production and the capacity of enzymatic protective mechanisms. The superoxide radical is dismutated by superoxide dismutase (SOD) to hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and molecular oxygen. [10] Hydrogen peroxide, as an oxidizing agent, is converted to oxygen and water by catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX). GPX protects the membrane lipids from oxidative damage and detoxifies the organic peroxides. It can also act on organic hydroperoxides. [11] In recent years, a few studies have shown the relation between lipid peroxide, enzymatic antioxidants, and exposure to aeroallergens, [12],[13] although the antioxidant indices levels and oxidative DNA damage among detergent-exposed workers and their follow-up have never been reported. In the present study, two groups of workers were longitudinally exposed to enzyme and detergent dusts of work place in two different detergent production plants. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of work place enzyme and detergent dust, smoking habit, and improvement of inhalation air of work-place on the levels of workers' lipid peroxidation, antioxidant enzyme activities, and the status of DNA damage parameters in different monitoring times.


  Materials and Methods Top


Study population and plant description

The primary target population consisted of 334 male workers who were employed on a permanent basis in a detergent industry, of whom 291 workers were retained as target group after application of exclusion criteria and consideration of workers who left employment or moved and/or canceled their participation through this study. Of these, 153 workers were in the enzyme-free detergent production plant and 138 in the enzyme-plus detergent production plant, where total production volume of the two kinds of detergent powders were equal over this study. In addition, protease enzyme was used in detergent production. All workers were exposed to dust of the work place during manufacturing processes, mixing, filling, and packing on the basis of 7-8 h/day and 5-day-week. They were interviewed periodically with a medical detailed by internists and underwent periodical laboratory examinations once a year.

The control group consisted of 45 workers without environmental and work place exposure to detergents and enzymes with the same pre-conditions and time frame. They were screened through an initial questionnaire with regard to the same occupational physician, similar socioeconomic status (salary, education), and similar workload characteristics. They were free of exposure to heavy metals, organic solvents, and aeroallergens. They had clinical examinations once a year and worked in the same geographical region and climatic conditions. All participants in this study had similar diets, which were served in a 6-day cycle menu in their work place. Smokers included all current smokers, smoking on average 12 cigarettes daily and were allowed to smoke during their work shift. Before this study, they had 3.5 0.6 years of smoking. Non-smokers had not smoked at least one cigarette a day for as long as 2 years. The participants of both the groups were interviewed by a questionnaire for medical and occupational history, amounts of tobacco smoking, daily consumption of non-alcoholic beverages, dietary habits (especially fruits, vegetables, fish, milk products), and for drug use. Subjects were excluded if they had any history of occupation in the detergent or enzyme industry, if they adhered to any dietary restrictions, or if they were exposed to industrial dust and other harmful agents to the nervous, immune, and respiratory systems. The participants did not take anti-inflammatory agents, steroid hormones, antioxidants, or vitamin supplements. They were also asked to refrain from any form of exercise during the medical and laboratory survey period. They had no overt clinical cardiovascular disorders, neuromuscular dysfunction, or respiratory disease before employment in the detergent industry. Cases with diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. According to pre-employment clinical records, all participants in this study were in good health at the first survey. Each participant underwent a complete examination by the same certified specialist with a special experience in the diagnosis of certain abnormalities and was unaware of participant's occupational conditions over this study.

Questionnaire

The questionnaire included demographic data, current smoking habit, and work-related symptoms.

Study design

This study was conducted from November 1991 to December 2002 for exposed workers and controls in three different times of monitoring, including: first monitoring, at the time of employment; second monitoring, 7.2 0.3 years after employment (just before installation of bag filters in the work place); third monitoring, 3.1 0.2 years after second monitoring.

Selenium in plasma

Recommended method for determining selenium in plasma specimens was flameless atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) (Unicam; model 929. Cambridg, England) with deuterium background corrector. [14]

Vitamin C and iron in plasma

Collected heparinized blood was centrifuged to obtained plasma. Ascorbic acid in plasma was oxidized by Cu 2+ (from copper sulfate solution) to form dehydroascorbic acid, which reacts with acidic 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine to form a red bis-hydrazon, which is measured photometrically at A520 (normal: 0.4-1.5 mg/Liter). [15] Diluted plasma (1:1 with deionized water) was analyzed for iron by atomic absorption spectroscopy (Unicam; model 929). The method was as described by the "International committee for standardization in hematology." [16]

Antioxidant enzyme assay

Heparinized whole blood was centrifuged for 10 min at 2000 g and then aspirated off the plasma. The erythrocytes were then washed four times with 3 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride solution. Aliquots of the washed erythrocytes were lysed.

The SOD activity in erythrocytes was measured according to the method of Misra and Fridovich, [17] in which the activity in erythrocytes was on the basis of their ability to inhibit free radical chain oxidation in which O 2 - was a chain-propagating radical and the autooxidation of epinephrine was included. Human erythrocyte SOD (Sigma, Lenexa, KS, USA) was used as a standard and the activity was expressed in U/g. Hb. CAT activity of the erythrocytes after washing thrice with isotonic sodium chloride was measured at 25C as previously described. [18] 1 k of CAT activity was defined as the rate constant of the first order reaction. GPX activity in whole blood was measured by the method of Paglia et al. [19] Heparinized whole blood (0.05 ml) was diluted with 1 ml diluting agent, incubated for 5 min, and then 1 ml of double strength Drabkin's reagent was added and mixed well. GPX catalyses the oxidation of glutathione (GSH) by cumene hydroperoxide. In the presence of GSH reductase and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), the oxidized GSH is immediately converted to the reduced form, with the concomitant oxidation of NADPH to NADP + . The decrease in absorbance at 340 nm was measured by a spectrophotometer.

All analyses were performed on the spectrophotometer - UV Gilford (model 250, Nova Blotech, San Diego California). Activities were expressed as units per gram of hemoglobin (Hb).

Hemoglobin

The hemoglobin in the erythrocyte lysates was estimated by the method of Drabkin and Austin. [20]

Malondialdehyde (MDA) in plasma

The MDA concentration in plasma was measured by the high-performance liquid chromatography technique (model: crystal 200; Beckman Instrument Inc., Fullerton California) in which the MDA-thiobarbituric acid (TBA) adduct was separated. [21] Briefly, plasma lipoperoxides were hydrolyzed by boiling in diluted phosphoric acid. MDA was reacted with TBA to yield the MDA-TBA adduct. The protein-free extract was fractionated on a C 18 column of octadecyl silicagel to separate the MDA-TBA adduct by elution with methanol/phosphate buffer and quantified by a spectrophotometer at 532 nm (model 4225; Unicam, LCD/Analytical).

Determination of 8OH-2'dG in urine

8OH-2'dG levels in the urine were measured essentially as described previously. [22] Briefly, an automated column switching method for 8OH-2'dG is based on the unique selectivity of the integral porous carbon column for purines. Samples were injected onto a C8 column and the band containing 8OH-2'dG was then quantitatively trapped on a carbon column. The selectivity of the carbon column for 8OH-2'dG allows elimination of interfering peaks by washing the column with a second mobile phase and then eluting 8OH-2'dG to an analytical C18 column with an identical mobile phase containing adenosine to displace 8OH-2'dG. Detection with series colorimetric electrodes provides qualitative certainty for 8OH-2'dG peak by response ratios.

Measurement of DNA base oxidative damage

1. Blood sampling: A 2 ml blood sample was mixed with an equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Three milliliters of Histopaque-1119 (Sigma) was layered in 10 ml polypropylene conical tubes. The diluted blood was carefully layered over the gradient and then spun at 300g for 15 min at 4 o C. The opaque layer containing peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was aspirated and transferred to separated siliconized glass tubes and washed with 5 ml PBS. The cell pellet was resuspended with PBS to give a final cell concentration of 6 X 10 4 cells/ml.

2. The principle of the SCGE (or comet assay) for the detection of DNA strand breaks has been described previously. [6] Briefly, microscopic slides were coated with melted 1% standard agarose and dried down on a warm heater. PBMC suspension (30l) was mixed with 60 l low melting point agarose (LMA) and added to the slides. The slides were covered with a coverslip and kept in a refrigerator for 5 min. Then, the coverslip was removed and the slides were immersed in a jar containing lysing solution (2.5 M NaCl, 0.1 M EDTA, 10 mM Tris, and 1% Triton X-100) at 4 o C for 1 h. After lysis, the slides were gently placed in an electrophoresis tank in 0.3 M NaOH and 1 mM Na 2 EDTA for 40 min. Electrophoresis was then carried out at 25 V and 300 mA for 30 min. After electrophoresis, the slides were neutralized in 0.4 M Tris buffer (pH 7.5), rinsed in distilled water, and stained with approximately 50 l of SYBR Green 1. After this, each slide was immediately viewed by fluorescence microscopy. Microscopic slides were coated with the mixture of PBMC and LMA as described above. After cell lysis, the slides were washed three times in a buffer containing 40 mM HEPES, 0.1 KCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 0.2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (pH 8.0). Then, 50 l of either endonuclease III (1 mg/ml) or formamidopyrimidine glycosylate (22 pg/l) was placed on to agarose (a total of two separate slides) and the gel was covered with a coverslip and incubated at 37 o C for 45 min. Comet in each gel was analyzed using a charge-coupled device camera and komet 3.0 image analysis program (Kinetic Imaging Ltd., Liverpool, UK). The frequency of DNA single strand breaks was determined by measuring the percent of DNA in the tail portion (tail DNA) from a total of 50 mononuclear cells per sample (25 cells from each of the two replicate slides). The data were further standardized using an internal standard, obtained from the K562 human erythroleukemia cell line, as described previously. [23] The amount of oxidized pyrimidines (endonuclease III-sensitive sites) or purines (formamidopyrimidine glycosylase 43-sensitive sites) in DNA was measured by subtracting the tail DNA without enzyme treatments from the tail DNA with enzyme incubation. [24] Observation and analysis of the results were carried out by the same experienced person and were conducted in a blind way, i.e. the observer had no knowledge of the identity of the slide.

Detergent monitoring and enzyme analysis in the air of the work place

The sampling strategy included static measurement for total detergent dusts and parallel stationary environmental monitoring of respirable (below 0.8 m) and non-respirable dust, in which the samples were obtained using high-volume samplers and high-efficiency glass fibers. The Galley samplers were strategically positioned at fixed locations in the plant, which were best suited to estimate exposure conditions of the employees. Samples were taken for 10 days and each day for 8 h at a flow rate of 36 cfm. Total particulate concentrations were determined gravimetrically and reported as micrograms of total dust per cubic meter of air (g/m 3 ). [25]

The size-mass distributions of airborne dust particles were determined by use of a 1 cfm eight-stage cascade impactor. The impactor was positioned adjacent to the high-volume samplers. Eight-hour time-weighted average personal breathing zone exposures to total particulates was determined using standard sampling techniques. Particulates were collected at a flow rate of 0.07 cfm on 37-mm diameter, 0.8 m pore size, polyvinyl chloride membrane filters that were contained in three-piece closed face cassettes. Fraction particle size was on the basis of filter pore size used in particle entrapment and passage. Respiratory detergent dust was considered as non-respirable fraction plus respirable mass.

The estimation of proteolytic enzyme content in a sample was based on the reaction of the enzyme with N, N-dimethyl casein. Amino acids formed by reaction with the enzyme were caused to react with 2, 4, 6-trinitrobensulphonic acid to form a colored complex. Enzyme concentrations were reported as micrograms of proteolytic activity per cubic meter of air (g/m 3 ) on the basis of a pre-determined assay that Esperase enzyme contained 2.6% pure crystalline-proteolytic enzyme. [25] The recommended level of exposure to proteolytic enzyme was calculated from the total enzyme dust threshold limit value (TLV) of 0.06 g/m 3 proposed by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). [26] The calculated enzyme-equivalent expression for proteolytic enzyme was 3.9 g/m 3 . [27]

Cumulative exposure index (CEI)

This parameter was calculated for each subject by multiplying the average annual airborne detergent or enzyme concentration in respirable dust characteristic of each job by the number of years in which this activity was performed. The average daily intake of detergent from air was estimated on the assumption that there was 100% absorption of respirable detergent dusts from 6.66 m 3 daily inhalation volume (20 m 3 daily inhalation volume for a 70 kg adult] 1/3 [rate of daily work shift time] = 6.66 m 3 ) for a complete period of daily work shift. The index was expressed in micrograms of particulate per cubic meter of air times duration of exposure in years.

Detergent measurement in water

The detergent analysis was on the basis of the methylene blue reaction as the precise and useful method for overestimating of anionic surfactant content of water, named as methylene blue active substances reaction. At first, the surfactant was separated by sublation process from the water sample, which yields a dried residue relatively free of non-surfactant substances. Then, the extracted material reacted with methylene blue solution. The process was followed by an aqueous backwash and measurement of the blue color in the CHCl3 by spectrophotometry at 652 nm. [28] The detection limit was equal to or greater than 10 g/L. When obtaining samples for chemical analysis, great care was taken against contaminating the water samples. Sampling bottles were carried in suitable crates and delivered to the laboratory without delay.

Water mineral analysis

The concentration of manganese, [29] lead, [30] zinc, [30] and iron [31] in the water was determined by atomic absorption spectrometry.

Nitrate and hardness of water

The method used for the measurement of nitrate was based on photometric analysis after reduction to nitrite. [32] The hardness of water samples was expressed as calcium carbonate concentration per liter. It is usually calcium hardness that predominates. [33]

Statistical analysis

The c2 and z tests were used for testing differences in the mean values of enzymatic and non-enzymatic parameters of plasma and erythrocytes, concentrations of dust-enzyme and total dust of work place air, and mean values of water minerals. The z test was also used for testing differences in comet assays results. Group comparison was assessed by ANOVA. A level of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In the testing for relationships, the entire involved populations and parameters in second and third monitoring were considered separately and the Pearson's correlation was calculated.


  Results Top


[Table 1] demonstrates the selected demographic characteristics and smoking habits of the participants. The mean age of the study workers was around 27 years for E-plus and about 25 years for E-free detergent-exposed workers. There was no significant difference between each group of detergent producer workers and controls in terms of age, height, total time in industry, weight, and smoking status. Although the percentage of smokers in both detergent-exposed workers were higher than controls, the difference was not significant.

The distribution of stationary sampling dust levels and their enzyme contents are provided in [Table 2]. At first monitoring, total dusts in the enzyme-plus detergent plant ranged from 930 to 1580 g/m 3 , with a mean value of 1346 g/m 3 , and in the enzyme-free detergent plant these ranged from 1065 to 1750 g/m 3 , with a mean value of 1428 g/m 3 . Both mean values were greater than the particulate level guideline (1000 g/m 3 ) used by the soap and detergent industry association. [34] Respirable fraction of total mass of inhaled particles were around 40-45% in most breathing zones. Enzyme levels in total dust were around 0.5%, of which about 60% were in the respirable portion. The mean concentrations of enzyme were greater than the TLV of 0.06 g/m 3 proposed by the ACGIH. [26] The concentrations of airborne parameters did not change significantly before bag-filter installation but decreased significantly after improvement of work place and at the end of this study. In new conditions of the work place, total dust and the level of enzymes were considerably lower than the Soap and Detergent Industry Association (SDIA) and TLV levels, respectively. In addition, the filtration lowered the respirable portion to 37% in the field of enzyme plus detergent plant and the levels of airborne parameters did not differ significantly.

The chemical composition of consumed water at all stages of monitoring is presented in [Table 3]. The mean concentrations of all minerals, nitrate, and hardness did not exceed the WHO guideline values (Pb = 50 g/L, Mn = 50 g/L, nitrate = 10 mg/L, Zn = 500 g/L, Fe = 300 g/L) and changed insignificantly over this study. In addition, the levels of detergent in drinking water were below the detection limit of 0.01 mg/L.

The mean values of biological parameters in the subgroups of detergent-exposed workers and controls are illustrated in [Table 4]. Mean activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, and GPX) and mean concentration of MDA were significantly higher in the second and third monitoring in both detergents-exposed workers as compared with the same group at first monitoring and controls. Recent parameters were significantly higher in current smokers than in non-smokers in enzyme-plus and enzyme-free detergent-exposed workers at second and third monitoring, except GPX. Current smokers revealed insignificantly higher levels of GPX activity than non-smokers in second and third monitoring. At first monitoring, in spite of insignificant variation in the parameters among controls and two detergent-exposed groups, they did not differ significantly between their subgroups. In third monitoring, the mean values of MDA, SOD, CAT, and GPX decreased significantly in all detergent-exposed workers as compared with second monitoring. In addition, current smokers revealed higher levels in these indicators as compared with non-smokers. With regard to enzyme exposure, the enzyme-plus detergent-exposed workers showed significant increase in MDA level and SOD activity and insignificant elevation in activities of CAT and GPX as compared with enzyme-free detergent-exposed workers in the second and third monitoring times. The mean values of plasma selenium, iron, and vitamin C levels did not differ significantly between controls and their counterpart subgroups in detergent-exposed workers and were within normal ranges over this study.

As displayed in [Table 5], the investigated indicators in smokers and non-smokers did not show significant differences in each group of detergent-exposed workers and controls at the first monitoring time. Both subgroups in E-plus and E-free detergent fields exhibited significantly higher mean levels ( SD) of 8OH-2'dG, endonuclease III-sensitive sites, and DNA strand breaks at second monitoring as compared with their counterpart subgroups at first and/or third monitoring times and in comparison with controls. Although there was elevation in all indicators of [Table 5] in E-plus with respect to E-free detergent workers, they were only significantly different in the values of four recent indicated parameters at the second and/or third monitoring times. All determined parameters were higher in current smokers as compared with non-smokers in all detergent workers at the second and third monitoring times, among which the differences between two groups were significant for the values of DNA strand breaks, endonuclease III-sensitive sites, and 8OH-2'dG. These three recent parameter levels at the end of the study were significantly different and higher in both detergent-exposed workers with respect to the first monitoring time.

The results of relation analysis between two biomarkers of oxidative stress: MDA, SOD, DNA damage biomarker, and 8OH-2'dG with each other and with CEI are summarized in [Table 6] separately. All the analysis showed positive correlation in each monitoring time. The correlation values of the relation between the two indicated biological indicators of oxidative stress and/or between each of them with 8OH-2'dG increased from the first to the second and also to the third monitoring time. The correlation values of 8OH-2'dG-CEI in the field of E-free detergent and/or E-plus detergent field were lower in the second monitoring in comparison with the first monitoring and then increased from the second to the third monitoring.


  Discussion Top


In this study, we selected workers from two separate plants of detergent production, enzyme plus and enzyme-free. They were exposed to detergent dusts of the work place such that the mean levels in each form of respirable and non-respirable dusts were significantly and considerably greater than TLV announced by the ACGIH [26] for about 7.2 years before bag filter installation in their workplace. In addition, with regard to detergent absorption from drinking water, detergent analysis of water revealed that the levels of this compound were under detection limit. Accordingly, the individuals of detergent-exposed workers could not obtain detergent from drinking water. On this basis, lung is the main entry route for detergent and enzyme containing particles and the main site for ROS generation by accumulated and activated inflammatory cells. [35] These ROS may be involved in lipid peroxidation [36] and DNA damage and cause development in antioxidant enzymes. [37] Our follow-up of antioxidant enzyme activities and MDA level confirmed that all parameters increased significantly in both detergent-exposed workers at the second monitoring with a stimulating effect of enzyme exposure and smoking. It is therefore possible that exposure to airborne respiratory particles could be associated with increased antioxidant enzyme activities to convert ROS into inactive metabolites. Enzyme dusts may exert a potentiating effect on ROS generation via their protein properties, which increase the inflammatory reactions. [38] In addition, the lipid-like environment provided by detergents can stabilize antioxidant enzymes, leading to an elevation of their intrinsic activity. [39] On the other hand, the stimulatory effects of smoking may be attributed to the increased deposition of respiratory particles, [40] elevation in activated blood polymorph nuclear cells that release ROS, [41] and direct ROS production by composition of cigarette tobacco. [42] We also noted the possible antioxidant roles of selenium [43] and vitamin C. [44] Because of insignificant variations in plasma Se and vitamin C, they could not contribute to blood antioxidant variations. Neither could metal ions in drinking water that were in normal levels.

There is increasing evidence that ROS are involved in DNA damage by alterations of bases and strand breakage. DNA base adduct resulting from hydroxyl radical damage can be checked by evaluation of 8OH-2'dG [45] and strand breakage by tests such as comet assay. [46]

Our investigation showed that both groups of detergent workers revealed considerable increase in all evaluated DNA damage parameters, with an enhancement effect of enzyme dusts to detergent exposure. Among them, the increase in the levels of 8OH-2'dG, endonuclease III-sensitive sites, and DNA-breaks at second monitoring were significant with respect to the first and/or third monitoring and controls. These observations were in agreement with the studies of Camus et al. [47] and Loeckie et al. [48] and indicated that phagocyte hyperactivation in the respiratory system contributes to increased ROS generation, which permeate into cell nuclei, induce oxidative DNA damage, and increase urinary excretion of 8OH-2'dG. However, increase in the urinary level of 8OH-2'dG is usually associated with exposure to oxidative conditions. [48] Accordingly, we observed positive relation analysis values between 8OH-2'dG level with SOD activity and MDA levels, respectively, over this study. The stimulatory effect of smoking on DNA damage was in accordance with the study of Maura et al., [49] which indicated the induction of oxidative DNA damage biomarkers such as 8OH-2'dG content in healthy men smokers.

By incorporating FPG and endonuclease III in the analysis of DNA migration, [50] our study further identified considerable oxidative base damage. Although DNA strand breaks showed significant increase in E-plus with respect to E-free detergent-exposed workers, oxidized pyrimidines, as determined by endonuclease III-sensitive sites, seemed to account for most of the oxidative DNA damage induced by detergent and enzyme exposure. It is possible that ROS produced in response to work place pollutants are more likely to cause oxidation of pyrimidines than purines. However, this notion contradicts the general belief that purines such as guanines are more easily oxidized because 8OH-2'dG is the most abundant oxidative modified DNA lesion. [51] Alternatively, the less marked increase in FPG-sensitive sites, coupled with a prominent post race increase in the urinary excretion of 8OH-2'dG, the most abundant repair product of oxidative damage to purines, seemed to imply that oxidized purines were repaired more effectively than oxidized pyrimidines. Our findings were consistent with the recent report of Kelvin et al., [52] demonstrating that the changes in the levels of endonuclease III-sensitive sites in peripheral leukocytes were more pronounced after massive aerobic exercise than FPG-sensitive sites and believed that oxidized purines were repaired more effectively than oxidized pyrimidines. The significant effect of smoking on two parameters of comet assay in our investigation were in accordance with its firmly established genotoxic effect, which also contributed to the DNA damage induced by tobacco smoke exposure. [53]

Following this dramatic overexposure to work place dusts for many years, bag-filter system installation in both plants of the work place was able to reach the level of total dust and their values of incorporated enzyme below SDIA and TLV levels, respectively. In the new work place condition, the reduction in antioxidant enzyme activities and MDA was accompanied with the decrease in CEI and decline in internal DNA damage parameters. On this basis, it is our conviction that these reductions were in response to improvement effects of the filtration system. The findings of the SDIA also showed a pronounced reduction in enzyme- and detergent-related sensitization corresponding to the environment improvement in the United Kingdom detergent factories. [54]

As suggestions, we underline medical surveillance program, periodic medical examinations, entrapment of inhaled particles with high efficiency to protect workers from excessive DNA damage, and, highly recommended, to stop smoking. It is helpful to consider meals enriched with vitamins E and C as ROS scavengers and inactivating factors. Additional studies on separate enzyme exposure from detergents are needed to understand individual genotoxic contributions and mechanisms.


  Conclusions Top


Workers exposed to high levels of enzyme-free and to enzyme-plus detergent dusts in two separate plants for several years showed significantly higher SOD, CAT, and GPX activities and lipid peroxidation in comparison with controls and with counterpart groups at the first monitoring. At the second monitoring, enzyme-plus detergent workers had significantly higher levels of these antioxidant enzyme activities and MDA as compared with enzyme-free detergent workers. In this monitoring time, the two groups were also different with controls and with first monitoring time in the levels of investigated DNA damage parameters.

With regard to our results, the observed increase in ROS generation and lipid peroxidation in this study can be considered as the main reason for initiation and promotion of DNA damage in any form. It is our conviction that detergent and enzyme contents of the workplace had a cumulative effect and that smoking had a synergistic effect on oxidative generation and initiation and progression of DNA damage in studied workers. We also propose that the observed decrease in the DNA damage parameters, particularly after filter installation, seems to be related to the filter system ability to reduce airborne detergent and enzyme dusts and the consequence of obvious decrease in the antioxidant enzyme activities and MDA levels (as indicators of decreasing free radicals generation) at the end of this study. In agreement to our propose, it has been demonstrated that inactivation or decreasing of free radicals can also modulate and improve the levels of DNA damage parameters after exposure to oxidative agents. [55] However, the overall data suggest that detergent production processes may contribute to an increase in the total burden of genotoxic damage among workers.


  Acknowledgments Top


The authors express their deep appreciation to the detergent factory management as well as the workers and persons from the region that participated for their extraordinary collaboration. We are grateful to the industrial mini city occupational clinic for their support in part for health services and also thank the research deputy of the Tarbiat Moalem University.

 
  References Top

1.Cheeseman KH, Salter TF. An introduction to free radical biochemistry. Br Med Bull 1993;49:481-93.   Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Miral D. Introduction to serial reviews on oxidative DNA damage and repair. Free Rad Biol Med 2002;32:677.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Dizdarglu M. Mechanism of free radical damage to DNA. In: Aruoma OI, Halliwell B, editors. DNA and free radicals: Technique, mechanisms and applications. St. Lucia: OICA International; 1998. p. 3-26.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Knight JA. Disease related to oxygen-derived free radicals. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1995;25:111-21.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  
5.Olinski R, Zastawny T, Budzbon J, Skokowski J. Base modification in chromatid of human cancerous tissues. FEBS Lett 1992;193:193-8.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Singh NP, Mc Coy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. A simple technique for quantification of low level of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 1998;175:184-91.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Richard IS. Environmental risk assessment of cleaning product ingredients. Chemosphere 1996;32:703-15.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Tripathi A, Grammer LC. Extrinsic allergic alveolitis from a proteolytic enzyme. Ann Allerg Asthma Immunol 2001;86:425-7.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM, Cross CE. Free radicals, antioxidants and human disease. Where are we now? J Lab Clin Med 1992;19:598-620.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Kobayashi T, Robinson JM, Seguchi H. Identification of intracellular sites of superoxide production in stimulated neutrophils. J Cell Sci 1998;111:81-91.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
11.Kantol M, Sarranen M, Vanha-Perttula T. Selenium and glutathione peroxidase in serum, plasma of men and bulls. J Reprod Fertil 1988;83:785-94.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Sedgwick JB, Calhoun WJ, Vrtis RF, Bates ME, McAllister PK, Busse WW. Comparison of airway and blood eosinophils function after in vivo antigen challenge. J Immunol 1992;149:3710-8.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
13.Postma DS, Renkema TE, Noordhooek JA, Faber H, Sluiter HJ, Kauffman H. Association between nonspecific bronchial reactivity and superoxide anion production by polymorph nuclear leukocytes in chronic air-flow observation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;137:57-61.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Jacobson BE, Lockith G. Direct determination of Selenium in serum by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry with deuterium background correction and a reduced palladium modifier. Clin Chem 1988;34:709-14.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Donald Mc BC, Harry LC. Vitamins. In: Carl AB, Edward RA, editors. Textbook of clinical chemistry. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: WB Saunders Co; 1999. p. 1024-25.   Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Fielding J. International committee for standardization in haematology: The measurement of total and unsaturated iron-binding capacity in serum. Br J Haematol 1978;38:281-9.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Misra HP, Fridovich L. The generation of superoxide radical during the autooxidation of hemoglobin. Biol Chem 1972;247:6960-2.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Perrine R, Briancon S, Jeandel C, Artur Y, Minn A, Penin F, et al . Blood activity of CuZn superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and catalase in Alzheimer′s disease: A case control study. Gerontology 1990;36:306-13.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Paglia DE, Valentine WN. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J Lab Clin Med 1987;70:158-69.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Drabkin D, Austin H. Spectrophotometric studies: Preparations from washed blood cells. J Biol Chem 1935;112:51-5.   Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Steven HY, Joseph AK, Sidney MH. Lipid peroxides in plasma as measured by liquid-chromatographic separation of malondialdehyde-thiobarbituric acid adduct. Clin Chem 1978;32:214-20.  Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Bogdanov MB, Beal MF, McCabe DR, Griffin RM, Matson WR. A carbon column based LCEC approach to routine 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine measurements in urine and other biological matrices. Free Radiat Biol Med 1999;27:647-66.   Back to cited text no. 22    
23.De Boeck M, Touil N, De Visscher G, Vande PA, Kirsch-Volders M. Validation and implementation of an internal standard in comet assay analysis. Mutat Res 2000;469:181-97.  Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Collins AR, Raslovα K, Somorovskα M, Petrovskα H, Ondrusovα A, Vohnout B, et al . DNA damage in diabetes: Correlation with a clinical marker. Free Rad Biol Med 1998;25:373-7.  Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Bruce CF, Dunn E, Brotherton R, Davies DR, Hall F, Potts SC. Methods of measuring biologically active enzyme dust in environment air of detergent factories. Ann Occup Hyg 1976;21:1-20.  Back to cited text no. 25    
26.American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Documentation of the threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents in the workroom environment with intended changes for 1980. 4 th ed. Cincinati, Ohio: 1980.   Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Kominsky JR, Liss GM. Health hazard evaluation. Report No: 8-65-780. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinati, Ohio: 1980.  Back to cited text no. 27    
28.Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 18th ed. Anionic surfactants as MBAS. 5540 C. American Public Health Association; 1992. p. 5-39.  Back to cited text no. 28    
29.Salvin S, Barnett MB, Kahn HL. The determination of atomic absorption detection limits by direct measurement. Atomic Abs News Lett 1979;11:33-41.  Back to cited text no. 29    
30.International organization for standardization, water quality-determination of Cobalt, Nickel, Cupper, Zinc, Cadmium and lead. Genewa: 1986 (ISO 8288:1989).   Back to cited text no. 30    
31.International organization for standardization, water quality-determination of iron. Geneva: 1988, (ISO, 6332:1988).  Back to cited text no. 31    
32.International organization for standardization, water quality-determination of nitrate. Geneva. 1986, (ISO, 7890-1,2: 1986; 3: 1988).  Back to cited text no. 32    
33.National Research Council. NRC. Drinking water and health. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 1977.  Back to cited text no. 33    
34.SDIA, Soap and Detergent Industry Association. Recommended operating procedures for UK factories handling enzyme materials. Ann Occup Hyg 1971;14:71.  Back to cited text no. 34    
35.Broide DH. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of allergic disease. J Allerg Clin Immunol 2001;108:S65-71.  Back to cited text no. 35    
36.Barry H, John Gutteridge MC. Mechanisms of damage to cellular targets by oxidative stress: lipid peroxidation. Chapter 4. In: Barry H, John Gutteridge MC, editors. Free radicals in biology and medicine. London: Oxford Science Publication; 1998. p. 284-306.  Back to cited text no. 36    
37.Nalini K, Henry JF. Reactive oxygen species in physiology and toxicology. In: Christopher JR, eds. Toxicology of the human environment. The critical role of free radicals. Chapter 16. London and New York: 2000. p. 311-28.  Back to cited text no. 37    
38.Flindt ML. Variables affecting the outcome of inhalation of enzyme dusts. Ann Occup Hyg 1982;26:647-55.  Back to cited text no. 38    
39.Mailer K, Del Maestro RF. Stability of the anti-oxidant enzymes in aqueous and detergent solution. Mol Cell Biochem 1991;107:47-54.  Back to cited text no. 39    
40.Camner P. Clearance of particles from the human bronchial tree. Clin Sci (Lond) 1980;59:79-84.  Back to cited text no. 40    
41.Bernard J, Gee L, Brook TM. Basic mechanisms in occupational lung disease including lung cancer and mesothelioma. In: Keith W, Morgan C, Seaton D, editors. Occupational lung disease. 3rd edition. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: WB Saunders Co; 1995. p. 191-202.  Back to cited text no. 41    
42.Nakayama T, Kodama M. Generation of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion radical from cigarette smoke. Gann 1984;75:95-8.  Back to cited text no. 42    
43.Michelson AM. Selenium glutathione peroxidase: Some aspects in man. J Environ Pathol Oncol 1998;17:233-9.  Back to cited text no. 43    
44.Ulrich S, Burkhard H, Michael J, Hanj J. Vitamin C improves endothelial dysfunction of epicardial coronary arteries in hypertensive patients. Circulation 1997;96:1513-9.  Back to cited text no. 44    
45.Bogdanov M, Brown RH, Matson W, Smart R, Hayden D, O′Donnell H, et al . Increased oxidative damage to DNA in ALS patients. Free Radiat Biol Med 2000;29:652-8.  Back to cited text no. 45    
46.Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR. Simple technique for quantification of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 1988;175:184-91.  Back to cited text no. 46    
47.Camus G, Deby-Dupont G, Duchateau J, Deby C, Pincemail J, Lamy M. Are similar inflammatory factors involved in strenuous exercise and sepsis? Intensive Car Med 1994;20:602-10.  Back to cited text no. 47    
48.de Zwart LL, Meerman JH, Commandeur JN, Vermeulen NP. Biomarkers of free radical damage applications in experimental animals and in humans. Free Radiat Biol Med 1999;26:206-26.  Back to cited text no. 48    
49.Maura L, Chira C, Roberta C, Lucia M, Piero D. Levels of 8-Hydroxyguanosine as a marker of DNA damage in human leukocytes. Free Radiat Biol Med 2000;28:13-7.   Back to cited text no. 49    
50.Collins AR, Dusinska M, Gedik C, Stetina R. Oxidative damage to DNA: Do we have a reliable biomarker? Environ Health Perspect 1996;104:465-9.  Back to cited text no. 50    
51.Loft S, Poulsen HE. Cancer risk and oxidative DNA damage in man. J Mol Med 1996;74:297-312.  Back to cited text no. 51    
52.Tsai K, Hsu TG, Hsu KM, Cheng H, Liu TY, Hsu CF, et al . Oxidative DNA damage in human peripheral leukocytes induced by massive aerobic exercise. Free Radiat Biol Med 2001;31:1465-72.  Back to cited text no. 52    
53.Holz O, Meissner R, Einhaus M, Koops F, Warncke K, Scherer G, et al . Detection of DNA single-strand breaks in lymphocytes of smokers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1993;65:83-8.  Back to cited text no. 53    
54.SDIA. Soap and Detergent Industry Association. Medical supervision of employees, engaged in manufacture of enzymatic production. London: 1973.  Back to cited text no. 54    
55.Fisher-Nielsen A, Loft S, Jensen KG. Effect of ascorbate and 5- amino salicylic acid on light-induced 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine formation in V79 Chinese hamster cells. Carcinogenesis 1993;14:2431-3.  Back to cited text no. 55    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article