Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine   Official publication of Indian Association of  0ccupational  Health  
 Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Users Online:707

  IAOH | Subscription | e-Alerts | Feedback | Login 

Home About us Current Issue Archives Search Instructions
  Search
 
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
     Search Pubmed for
     Search in Google Scholar for
   Related articles
    Article in PDF (356 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
  Results
  Discussion
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed202    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded13    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 106-110
 

Exposure to toluene di-isocyanate and respiratory effects in flexible polyurethane foam industries in Western India


1 Department of Occupational Hygiene, ICMR-Regional Occupational Health Center-Southern (NIOH), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 ICMR-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health (ICMR), Bhopal Bypass Road, Bhauri, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
3 ICMR-National Institute of Occupational Health (ICMR), Meghaninagar, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Date of Submission12-May-2020
Date of Acceptance13-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication9-Jul-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. S Raghavan
Scientist D, Departmet of Occupational Hygiene, ICMR-Regional Occupational Health Center-Southern (NIOH), Nirmal Bhavan, Poojanahalli Road, Kannamangala Post, Bangalore - 562110, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_158_20

Rights and Permissions

 

  Abstract 


Background: Flexible foam industry largely uses 2,4 and 2,6 Toluene di-isocyanate as main raw materials and chronic exposure to its result in occupational asthma. The exposure to di-isocyanates might be higher due to the usage of obsolete technology, hand-mixing methods and working in confined spaces with insufficient local exhaust ventilation systems in developing countries. Exposure studies in flexible foam industries have not been done in developing countries. Objective: The present cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate toluene di-isocyanate (TDI) exposures and respiratory health of the workers working in the seven flexible polyurethane foam industries located in Western India during 2010-2013. Method: A total of 128 personal air samples collected and evaluated for total TDI concentration using improved Occupational Safety and Head Administration method number 42. Then 194 workers were covered for complete clinical examination and spirometry for assessing respiratory health. Results: In all, 17.83% of air samples exceeded the ACGIH TWA-TLV of 0.005 ppm for TDI. Though only 11 (5.6%) workers had respiratory complaints, the spirometry revealed that 19 (9.8%) and four (2.1%) had restrictive and obstructive type of pulmonary function impairment, respectively. Conclusion: The TWA concentration of TDI exceeded at raw material storage, mixing, foaming, block cutting and curing areas in four out of seven industries even in the presence of local exhaust systems. The respiratory health effect is less when compared to exposure to TDI, suitable preventive and control measures were suggested based on the study findings to the stakeholders to prevent the increase of respiratory health effects.


Keywords: Exposure assessment, flexible foam industries, occupational asthma, pulmonary function, respiratory health, TDI


How to cite this article:
Raghavan S, Tiwari RR, Doctor PB, RekhaKashyap, Mahamad AM, Mansuri PR. Exposure to toluene di-isocyanate and respiratory effects in flexible polyurethane foam industries in Western India. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2021;25:106-10

How to cite this URL:
Raghavan S, Tiwari RR, Doctor PB, RekhaKashyap, Mahamad AM, Mansuri PR. Exposure to toluene di-isocyanate and respiratory effects in flexible polyurethane foam industries in Western India. Indian J Occup Environ Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 27];25:106-10. Available from: https://www.ijoem.com/text.asp?2021/25/2/106/321061





  Introduction Top


Occupational exposures to isocyanates occur during the production of flexible and rigid polyurethane foams.[1],[2] There is good evidence to indicate that isocyanates cause chemical bronchitis or pneumonitis, isocyanate asthma, causes non-specific airways disease including chronic bronchitis.[3],[4],[5],[6] Further asthma can occur at low concentrations of isocyanates, the higher the exposure greater the risk.[7] Other chemical agents such as amines used as a catalyst in the manufacture of polyurethane foam are also reported to cause the respiratory symptoms.[7] The studies reported that despite low airborne isocyanate concentrations, it was possible to demonstrate biological uptake of isocyanates through biological monitoring suggesting that absorption can also occur via dermal or other routes of exposure.[8],[9] A spirometric change suggestive of bronchial obstruction of a mild degree is also reported in the earlier study.[10]

The isocyanates and di-isocyanates are used in manufacturing a wide range of products such as synthetic rubber, synthetic textile fibres, glues and adhesives, anti-corrosive chemicals, wire and cable insulation, paints, lacquers, ink and varnishes, leather finishes, etc.[11],[12],[13] The major part of the world's isocyanate production is shared by the two isocyanates namely toluene di-isocyanate (TDI) and methylenediphenyl di-isocyanate (MDI). TDI is used as one of the raw materials for the production of flexible polyurethane foams. Polyurethane foam is produced when polyol is made to react with isocyanate (TDI in case of flexible polyurethane foam and MDI in case of rigid foam), catalyst, surfactant, colouring agent and blowing agents in a chilled condition. The density of the foam produced varies from 13 to 80 kg/m3. Once the foam is produced and attained the required size, it is cut into big blocks and kept for curing for 18 hours or above. The fully dried or cured blocks are cut by horizontal and vertical cutting machines into various sizes as per customer requirement, packed and transported to respective destinations.

In flexible foam industries, the reaction between TDI and polyol being exothermic, the TDI becomes airborne during mixing and foaming process and workers might be exposed to high concentrations of TDI.[14] In developing countries such as India, the process in the manufacturing of flexible foam involves hand mixing of chemicals, working in confined spaces, absence of efficient local exhaust ventilation and mostly obsolete technology. So the exposure is often more than the permissible limit of ACGIH TLV-TWA of 0.005 ppm.[15] Further, in the absence of regulatory standards such as permissible exposure limits in India, there is a necessity to evaluate TDI concentrations and its effect on the respiratory system of workers in flexible foam industries. Thus the present study was undertaken to evaluate TDI concentration in different work areas; to assess the respiratory health of the workers exposed to TDI and to suggest suitable preventive and control measures to reduce exposures to the stakeholders.


  Materials and Methods Top


This study was conducted during 2010-2013 in seven flexible foam industries located in Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar, Sabarkantha and Mahesana districts of Gujarat and Silvassa area of Western India. The study protocol included exposure assessment of TDI and the health monitoring of the workers. The project was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Occupational Health, Ahmedabad meeting held on 10 June 2008 with reference no. NIOH/EC/SK/2008/1514/1554; Agenda No. 3.

Exposure assessment of TDI

A total of 128 air samples were collected and evaluated for total TDI concentration. The modified OHSA 42 method was applied for sampling and analysis of TDI. An external standard calibration curve in the range of 0.5-9.0 ng/ml has been prepared for 2, 4- and 2, 6-Toluene Di-IsocynatoPolyurea (TDIP). The concentrations of 2, 4- and 2, 6-TDIP in air samples were determined using the external standard calibration curve.

The airborne TDIs samples were collected through the SKC 225-9002 filter cassettes (sampling media coated with 1, 2-Pyridyl Piperidine 1-2 mg) fitted to personal air samplers at the flow rate of 0.5 l/min for the entire work shift of 6-8 hours in different process areas of seven flexible foam industries. The airborne TDI is converted into TDIP by reacting with 1, 2-pyridyl piperidinecoated on the filter paper. The collected air samples-filter cassettes were end-capped and transported in an ice pack with proper labelling and kept in the refrigerator until analysis.

The TDIP present in the sampled filters were extracted with 2 ml of 90:10 ACN: DMSO mixture. An aliquot of 20 μl were injected into Shimatzu 10 ATVP services HPLC-Fluorescence instrument ([email protected] 270 nm and emission @340 nm) using autosampler as per OSHA method number 42. The HPLC conditions employed for the analysis of 2, 4 and 2, 6-TDIs are shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: HPLC conditions employed for the analysis of 2, 4- and 2, 6-TDI

Click here to view


The reliable quantitation limit for the 2, 6-TDI and 2, 4-TDI in air samples were 0.32 and 0.36 parts per billion (ppb), respectively. The reliable quantitation limit for total TDI (2, 6 TDI + 2, 4 TDI) is 0.68 ppb that is equal to 0.00068 parts per million (ppm). The total TDI values found below the reliable quantitation limit of 0.68 ppb (0.00068 ppm) were reported as below detection limit (BDL). The total TDI values found below LOQ of 0.00068 ppm were divided by 2 for statistical analysis. The TDIP concentrations were converted into TDI using the conversion factor of 0.3479 and finally expressed as milligrams of TDI. This concentration of total TDI in milligram was divided by the volume of air samples in cubic meters to get the total TDI concentration in mg/m3.

Health monitoring

A total of 194 randomly selected workers out of 300 employed in the selected polyurethane foam manufacturing units were monitored in the study. After explaining the purpose of the study, the informed written consent was obtained in vernacular language (Gujarati and Hindi). The information regarding demographic, occupational and clinical history was collected on a pre-designed and pre-tested proforma through interview of the subject. This was followed by a complete clinical examination with special emphasis on respiratory system. The spirometric parameters of the subjects were measured using Spirovit SP- 10 (M/s Schiller AG, Switzerland) following standard protocol. For categorizing the pulmonary function impairment, a cut-off of 80% of predictive FVC and 70% of FEV1/FVC ratio was taken to label it restrictive or obstructive impairment, respectively.[16] For the analysis, the smoking habit was dichotomized into ever smoker (included current smokers and ex-smokers) and never smoker. Statistical analysis was carried out using the statistical software package “Epi Info 5” (World Health Organization, Geneva) and included calculation of proportion and percentages and application of tests of significance such as ANOVA.


  Results Top


A total of 128 air samples were analysed for total TDI including 124 air samples in the study area and 4 samples outside the industry. The correlation coefficient (r2) values of 2, 4- and 2, 6-TDIP for external standard calibration curves were 0.999581 and 0.999795, respectively. The HPLC conditions employed for the analysis of 2, 4- and 2, 6-TDI is shown in [Table 1].

The time-weighted average (TWA) value of total TDI found in seven flexible foam industries is given in [Table 2]. The mean total TDI concentration varied from BDL of 0.00068 ppm to a maximum of 0.1225 ppm. The average TDI value found from all the production areas is 0.0015 ppm for industry 1, (0.0357 ppm) for industry 2, (0.0232 ppm) for industry 3, 0.0022 ppm for industry 4, 0.003 ppm for industry 5, 0.0010 ppm for industry 6 and 0.0012 ppm for industry 7. Thus, except for industry 2 and industry 3, the average total TDI concentration was within the TWA-TLV of 0.005 ppm.[15] The reason might be due to poor local exhaust system or of lower capacity especially over the foam production area as well as poor general ventilation in raw material storage and mixing area and block cutting areas.
Table 2: Total TDI values of the foam industries and control areas

Click here to view


The TWA values of total TDI found in different process areas in all seven industries is given in [Table 3]. In industry 1, the highest exposure was found in raw material storage, mixing area and foam production, that is, foaming area, whereas lowest exposure (BDL) was found in the curing area. In industry 2, the minimum TWA concentration of total TDI was found in the curing area and the maximum concentration was found in the block cutting machine area. In industry 3, the total TDI found was BDL in the curing area, the maximum was in foam production and raw material storage, and mixing areas that were exceeded the ACGIH TWA-TLV of 0.005 ppm. In industry 4, the concentration was BDL in the packing area, whereas maximum concentration was found both in the foaming area and block cutting area. In industry 5, the concentration has exceeded the ACGIH TWA-TLV value at foaming area, whereas in all other departments namely raw material storage/mixing area, curing area, horizontal and vertical cutting machine area, peeling area, finished block storage area, packaging/despatching area, administration office and outside industry-security gate it was BDL for total TDI. In industries 6 and 7, higher concentration was found in raw material mixing area and foaming area, however, in all other work areas it was BDLs.
Table 3: Process-wise total TDI values in foam industries

Click here to view


The TDI value exceeding the ACGIH TLV recommended limit in four industries and different processes is shown in [Table 4]. Twenty-three air samples exceeded the recommended TLV limits of 0.005 ppm for total TDI.[15] It was observed the TWA values of total TDI had exceeded the TLV limits in foam production, block cutting and raw material storage and mixing areas. Out of the 23 samples exceeding TWA TLV levels maximum[15] were from the foaming process area followed by 4 each from block cutting and storage and mixing areas.
Table 4: Higher than the recommended levels of TDI in industries and processes (n=23)

Click here to view


The health monitoring was carried out in 194 subjects, which comprises 184 (94.8%) males and 10 (5.2%) females. The mean age of the workers was 29.26 ± 9.27 years and the mean duration of exposure was 6.73 ± 5.6 years. 31.9% of workers were involved in the loading and unloading of finished products. Workers who were operating the vertical, horizontal and circular cutting machines followed this. Only 24 (12.4%) of the workers were engaged in the foaming process. [Table 5] depicts the indicators of respiratory health. Only 11 (5.6%) subjects had respiratory complaints such as cough, sputum production and complaint of breathlessness while remaining did not report any symptom at the time of the study. The spirometry revealed that 87.1% of the subjects were not having any pulmonary impairment while 9.8% and 2.1% had a restrictive and obstructive type of pulmonary function impairment, respectively. Only one subject had combined type, that is, both obstructive and restrictive type of impairment while one subject did not cooperate for performing the procedure. When the mean FVC and FEV1 values (indicators of respiratory function) were compared between foam production workers and office staff, a significant reduction in FVC (P = 0.005) and FEV1 (P = 0.028) was observed among production workers. This suggests that exposure to TDI results in affects the respiratory function. However, when controlled for factors like age, duration of exposure and smoking habits the difference in mean FVC and FEV1 values between foam production workers and the office staff was found statistically non-significant (P > 0.05).
Table 5: Respiratory health indicators in the study population (n=194)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The present study carried out in polyurethane foam units of Western India reveals that in some of the units the TWA for total TDI in some of the units was higher than the recommended TLV. It is interesting to note that in our study even in the presence of local exhaust ventilation (LEV) system at foaming areas, the TWA values have exceeded the ACGIH TLV-TWA of 0.005 ppm in the foaming area in four industries out of seven studied. Earlier studies in the polyurethane foam industry also reported exposure to TDI at the workplace. A similar study measured TDI exposures and reported air concentrations of TDI isomers in the range of 0.2-58.9 μg/m3.[10] The highest concentrations of TDI were found in the workstations of the maintenance workers (9.9-41.5 μg/m3) and paper folders (0.3-58.7 μg/m3). Lower concentrations of TDI were found in the samples collected from the work stations of foaming head operators (0.6-11.3 μg/m3) and cutting machine operators (0.2-6.5 μg/m3).

In this study, the total TDI concentrations found in flexible foam industries varied from BDL of 5.0-255 μg/m3. The wide variations in the average total TDI concentrations in our study may be due to many factors such as wide variation in efficiency and capacity of local exhaust ventilation systems over the foaming area, more or less number of foaming cycles during the study period, general ventilation and open spaces existing in these industries. An earlier study evaluated TDI concentrations in 100 air samples and reported varied concentrations of 53-81 μg/m3.[17] Similarly, another study has also reported low and varied airborne concentrations of TDI in moulded polyurethane products, insulation materials and spray painting operations.[8]

In the present study, only 11 (5.6%) workers had respiratory symptoms. This may be attributed either to the healthy worker effect on the job or to effective control technology in the industry. Further, only 2.1% had shown obstructive pattern on spirometry.

Limitation of the study: However as we could not perform the bronchodilator test, the chronicity of this obstructive pattern could not be ascertained. The biological monitoring for TDI metabolite (toluene diamine (TDA)), which is more specific indicator to show the effect and absorbed dose, could not be performed in this study due to the limited resources.

Thus to conclude, this study is some polyurethane foam industries, the TWA of TDI exceeded the ACGIH TWA-TLV of 0.005 ppm. The processes such as foaming, block cutting, raw material storage and mixing areas reported higher values of TDI suggesting a risk of developing respiratory ill health in workers involved in these processes. However, the study did not show any alarming level of respiratory ill health among workers that can be due to better control measures at the workplace. Based on the results of the study suitable recommendations that include environment management guidelines, emergency procedures to be followed during spills and leaks, first aid tips, health management guidelines and suitable personal protective equipment for workers handling TDI (ACS, 2013) were suggested to stakeholders.

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Govt. of India for their financial support. We are thankful to Foam industries management, Directorate of Industrial Safety and Health-Govt. of Gujarat and Central Pollution Control Committee Dadra & Nagar Haveli for their cooperation for the study. We are thankful to the Director, technical, project and administration staff of NIOH Ahmedabad for their continuous support help for the study.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient (s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Govt. of India.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Brzeznicki S, Bonczarowska M. Occupational exposure to selected isocyanates in Polish industry. Med Pr2015;66:291-301.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Garrido MA, Gerecke AC, Heeb N, Font R, Conesa JA. Isocyanate emissions from pyrolysis of mattresses containing polyurethane foam. Chemosphere2017;168:667-75.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Daniels RD. Occupational asthma risk from exposures to toluene diisocyanate: A review and risk assessment. Am J Ind Med 61:282-92.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
El-Zaemey SD, Glass L, Fritschi E, Darcey R, Carey T, Driscoll T, et al. Isocyanates in Australia: Current exposure to an old hazard. J Occup Environ Hyg2018;15:527-30.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pala G, Pignatti P, Moscato G. Occupational exposure to toluene diisocyanate and neutrophilic bronchitis without asthma. ClinToxicol (Phila) 2011;49:506-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Uranga AM, Sanchez-Ortiz M, MorellF, Cruz MJ, Munoz X. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis due to isocyanates: Lung function, clinical and radiological characteristics. Arch Bronconeumol2013;49:169-72.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Meredith SK, Bugler J, ClarkRL. Isocyanate exposure and occupational asthma: A case-referent study. Occup Environ Med2000;57:830-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Creely KS, Hughson GW, Cocker J, Jones K. Assessing isocyanate exposures in polyurethane industry sectors using biological and air monitoring methods. Ann OccupHyg2006;50:609-21.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Prueitt RL, Lynch HN, Zu K, Shi L, Goodman JE. Dermal exposure to toluene diisocyanate and respiratory cancer risk. Environ Int2017;109:181-92.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Swierczynska-Machura D, Brzeznicki S, Nowakowska-Swirta E, Walusiak-Skorupa J, Wittczak T, Dudek W, et al. Occupational exposure to diisocyanates in polyurethane foam factory workers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health2015;28:985-98.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Engfeldt M, IsakssonM, Zimerson E, Bruze M. Several cases of work-related allergic contact dermatitis caused by isocyanates at a company manufacturing heat exchangers. Contact Dermatitis2013;68:175-80.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Frick M, Isaksson M, Bjorkner B, Hindsen M, Ponten A, Bruze M. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in a company manufacturing boards coated with isocyanate lacquer. Contact Dermatitis2003;48:255-60.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Ramzy AG, Lammintausta K, Matura M, Brared Christensson J, Nilsson U, Hagvall L. Isothiocyanates are important as haptens in contact allergy to chloroprene rubber. Br J Dermatol2017;177:522-30.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Vangronsveld E, Berckmans S, Spence M. Toluene diisocyanate emission to air and migration to a surface from a flexible polyurethane foam. Ann OccupHyg2013;57:650-61.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
ACGIH: “TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices”. Cincinnati, OH: Kemper Meadow Drive; 2015.p. 148.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. EurRespir J2005;26:948-68.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Mirmohammadi M, Ibrahim MH, Ahmad A, Kadir MO, Mohammadyan M, MirashrafiSB. Evaluation of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate as an indoor air pollutant and biological assessment of methylene dianiline in the polyurethane factories. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2009;13:38-42.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article